The purpose of scaling is to rectify anomalies in mark distributions that arise from unanticipated circumstances and should be used in exceptional circumstances only. Hence, the assessment criteria and practices for any module that has its marks scaled should be reviewed in order to reduce the chance that scaling will be necessary in subsequent years.
Where scaling is employed for adjusting agreed assessment marks within a module to correct abnormal group performance, the following rules must be adhered to:
See also: University TQA Handbook - Scaling of Marks.
Note: The University's Assessment Handbook Working Group is recommending University-wide adoption of the above policy to the June 2014 meeting of the Faculty of Taught Programmes. The APAC replaces the discipline-level functions of the Board of Examiners
The APAC will consider the mark distribution statistics of all modules and identify those with anomalous outcomes that, in the Committee's judgement, merit further investigation. Criteria may be based on the statistics provided by SITS. Where feasible, however, a more sophisticated analysis should be used, for example by using the
The Committee must avoid using criteria that inevitably cause grade inflation/deflation, e.g. by considering only modules with a high number of 'fail' grades but ignoring modules with a high number of 'excellent' grades.
The APAC will appoint appropriately experienced member(s) of staff to review the assessment of the module(s) identified and to recommend what, if any, scaling of the mark distributions is necessary to align the module with the applicable University marking criteria.
A pro-forma report is required for each module reviewed:
The reviewer will consider the evidence available and recommend whether, in their opinion, adjustments are necessary and of what type. Reviewers must keep in mind University policy that scaling should be used in exceptional circumstances only and it should therefore be recommended only when there is no reasonable alternative.
In order to allow time for the recommendations to be implemented, external examiners should asked to consider the Mark Distribution Forms at the earliest opportunity. Their signature on each form will confirm that the consultation required by University policy has occurred.
The recommendations made on the Mark Distribution Review Forms will be proposed to the APAC and final decisions made and minuted in accordance with the above policy. The criteria used to identify modules with anomalous outcomes should also be minuted.
Copies of the Mark Distribution Review Form must be: